Hal Turner is probably the most famous snitch of the day. His name gets thrown around constantly, especially in reference to disinformation, entrapment or provocation and bizarre FBI black operations against our citizens.
Bill White believes that he was arrested in October, 2008 because Hal Turner had emailed his contact in the FBI a PHONY “tip” about Bill White plotting to blow up the Poff Federal Building in Roanoke, Virginia with a truck bomb.
Here is Richard Barrett, (now dead by n-word), from his crosstar site on the Hal Turner case:
FROM LIAR TO LOSER TO LONER
Free-speech salvaged, but Turner devastated – Richard Barrett
There are three main reasons why I feel compelled to speak out on the Hal Turner case, in behalf of The Nationalist Movement. First, The Movement, apparently, was the first organization that Turner had tried to infiltrate, in March of 2002. Second, The Movement has written the law-of-the-land in the United States Supreme Court on free-speech. Finally, the course must be set, notwithstanding efforts by Turner and his cronies to stigmatize or derail Nationalism. Nationalism is the blood-based form of government, marked by a strong, central state, social-justice for those who work and rule by the majority of its people. In shorthand, Nationalism is the exact opposite of Communism.
Nationalists have been “rising again,” ever since minorities and aliens seized control of the nation, prompting their opponents to use every sort of device to scuttle them, from banishment to imprisonment to ridicule to infiltration to disinformation. Turner became part of the widespread, although illegal and undercover, ploy, to destabilize rightist political activism, which manifests itself in everything from fundamentalist Christians to gun-defenders to segregationists to anti-Communists. In a lawsuit against the FBI, in 1997, Nationalists uncovered secret files, which detailed that the agency had not quit spying on American citizens, even though the practice had been outlawed.
Agents exposed
Agent-provocateur tactics were exposed, on a much broader scale, when Turner was revealed to have been using the Internet to create the false-persona of a would-be assassin, to paint Nationalists as murderers and, even, entrap pro-majority activists into committing crimes. At first, Nationalists rejected Turner and warned against him. However, some insisted that Turner had “free-speech” rights, which, if impinged, would set a bad precedent for rightists, in general. However, being a “snitch” and a “rat” was so unappealing that Nationalists refused to utter any kind words for Turner, at all. Meanwhile, Turner’s wife, Phyllis, decried Nationalists as “snakes.”
Turner pointed to his Indian and Puerto Rican lawyers, his managing of a campaign for a Jew and his Negro and Jewish FBI-handlers as proof that he “never was” a Nationalist. He, also, produced memos to the FBI insisting that he was not what he appeared to be, for which he was paid over $100,000.00. Nationalists have said that they will use the case to press for enforcement of laws against Turner-style agent-provocateurs. Some Turner critics have suggested that Turner “got what he deserved,” by having to spend his loot on lawyers and bail-bonds and going bankrupt. Others say that the way Turner was hung out to dry by the FBI warns others from becoming informants.
Unanimous jury unlikely
A unanimous jury was unlikely at the Brooklyn, New York venue, where minorities abound, but anti-Israeli sentiment runs high. The main witnesses against Turner were Jewish judges, whose “offense” to being “threatened” did not meet the “reasonable-man” test, spelled out by the judge. Being unable to convict Turner, however, only underscores that saying that someone “deserves” to be killed does not override the First Amendment, although, in the same breath, Nationalists warn against threat-making. A “true” threat is when someone has the “imminent” means to “imminently” carry out a threat. A broadcast to a general audience, over the Internet, of “opinion,” does not qualify.
Since Turner fired his lawyers, at his second mis-trial, there has been speculation that Turner might seek legal-counsel from Nationalist lawyers. But, Nationalists say no. If the case were to reach the high-court, which is unlikely, they might file an amicus-curiae brief in support of free-speech, while making clear that Nationalists do not condone disinformation, entrapment or provocation. Some have suggested that Turner might seek to “return” to the very ones he had tried to entrap, saying that “all is forgiven.” Jurors were unimpressed, however, when prosecutors called Turner a liar, but sidestepped that Turner’s handlers were the ones who had lied to the public and to them.
Setback to Dees
The inability to convict Turner has been a setback to Morris Dees, who had claimed that Turner had an actual following and that laws were needed to halt such “danger.” Testimony, even by his opponents, revealed that Turner had no following, however. Abraham Foxman, who had campaigned that flag-wavers, returning-veterans and right-wing third-party supporters were “haters” and whose diatribes had been adopted by Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, was the biggest loser. The “danger” he proclaimed had been orchestrated by Obama-Administration officials, whose cover and credibility had been devastated. So, Nationalists only gained in stature.
According to Jeffrey Ullman, “Now is the time for Nationalists to speak out, to get the information out.” Ullman branded Dees, Foxman, Napolitano and Obama as “a movement of lies,” contrasted with The Nationalist Movement, which he termed “a movement of truth.” Ullman pointed out that the news-media had, also, taken a hit, because it had referred to Turner as a “right-winger,” even when Turner, himself, as well as prosecutors, asserted otherwise. With Turner exposed as a fraud, the public as asking, “Will the real Nationalists please stand up?” “It is a risk to speak out,” warns Ullman, “but our words and actions are one-hundred percent patriotic and empowering Americans.”
Bill White Trial Update 