Archive for the ‘Virginia Beach Tenants’ Category

Some Documents on the Government Conspiracy Against Bill White

August 13, 2012

Here is the document Bill sent out last March to various news reporters. They ignored it at the time.

Don’t ask me if it all adds up.

Link:
Government Conspiracy against Bill White – Court Document filed by William White

You will see John Crocket Henry’s name at the top. He is or was the Virginia Beach tenants’ landlord.

From the document:

9) That the Plaintiff [the USA] has moved to seal the documents involved as part of a continuing coverup of criminal acts it committed in a so far successful effort to frame the Movant for crimes that he did not commit or which did not occur.

I’ll see if I can get Bill to explain more clearly what this was all about. I get that Bill says he didn’t make a certain threatening phone call to Kathleen Kerr, and the government knows he didn’t, and they lied when they said they “lost” the phone records which show who did make the call – one of their informants.

Updated, August 18, 2012

Link:
How I Was Tortured, Told to Lie by the Obama Regime

Url: http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/how_i_was_tortured_270.html

The $882,792 Letter

July 17, 2012

Read the letter that Bill White sent to the Virginia Beach Tenants:

civil rights error

You can’t say that!


Screen shot of the “Dear Whiney Section Eight Ngger” letter from United States v. White

US Government Tortures and Abuses Bill White

June 16, 2012

Updated, June 18, see below –

Bill White said on his Facebook page that he did not leave the USA because of any of his court cases. However, the civil* suit appeals, botched by Bill White’s lawyer Melissa Warner Scoggins, had come to an end and things were not looking good for Bill. He was going to have to hand over all his property and goods to his lawyer and start paying the Virginia Beach tenants the $882,792 they won in the civil suit in 2010.

Click thumbnail to read the Writ of Execution dated 4/27/12

Document 209

Document 209

However, Bill’s lawyer, Melissa Warner Scoggins, Esquire, quit before Bill fled.

To be continued….



Update No. 1
* Note: Civil, criminal, I’m confused, and so was Bill’s woman lawyer, so she says, see below.

Update No. 2
“If you ever need anything, please, don’t hesitate to ask someone else, first.”


In fact, Bill’s lawyer, Melissa Warner Scoggins, Esquire, apparently quit the very same day that the Writ was signed, March 27, 2012.

Unsigned letter posted by Bill White on his Facebook page.

Bill White’s Lawyer Quits
March 27, 2012


If this is legit, Scoggins confused some deadlines, cost Bill the chance to appeal to a higher court, and then quit.


Okay, I think I get it. Bill lost his appeal on the judeo-civil suit with the huge award and his lawyer failed to file a criminal case appeal around the same time. Game over. Bill lost his chance to clear his name as well as everything he had or would have.

Opinion for Bill White’s Case 708cr00054 Appeal before Niemeyer, Duncan and Floyd

March 3, 2012

Bill White says he is taking this to the Supreme Court.


Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
James C. Turk, Senior District Judge.
(7:08-cr-00054-JCT-1)
Argued: October 28, 2011
Decided: March 1, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and FLOYD,
Circuit Judges.

Conviction affirmed, sentence vacated, and case remanded for
resentencing by published opinion. Judge Niemeyer wrote the
opinion for the court, in which Judge Duncan joined and
Judge Floyd joined in part. Judge Duncan wrote a separate
concurring opinion. Judge Floyd wrote a separate opinion
concurring in part and dissenting in part.

COUNSEL

ARGUED: Linda F. Thome, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT
OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for the United
States. Melissa Warner Scoggins, WARREN & ASSOCIATES,
PLC, Norfolk, Virginia, for William A. White. ON
BRIEF: Thomas E. Perez, Assistant Attorney General, Jessica
Dunsay Silver, Tovah R. Calderon, UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for the
United States. Rebecca K. Glenberg, Gabriel Z. Walters,
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF VIRGINIA
FOUNDATION, INC., Richmond, Virginia, for Amicus Supporting
William A. White.

OPINION
NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge:
A jury convicted William White, the “Commander” of the
American National Socialist Workers’ Party, on four counts
(of a seven-count indictment), Counts 1, 3, 5, and 6.
The convictionson Counts 1, 5, and 6
were for transmitting in interstate
commerce — by email, U.S. Mail, and telephone —
threats to injure or intimidate individuals, in violation of 18
U.S.C. § 875(c) (prohibiting interstate communications containing
threats to injure a person), and the conviction on
Count 3 was for violating 18 U.S.C. § 1512(b)(1) (prohibiting
the intimidation of individuals to “influence, delay, or prevent
the[ir] testimony”).

On White’s Rule 29 motion for judgment of acquittal,
based on arguments that his communications were political
speech protected by the First Amendment and, in any event,
the evidence was insufficient to support a finding of guilt, the
district court denied the motion as to Counts 1, 3, and 5 and
granted it as to Count 6. The court sentenced White to 30
months’ imprisonment, rejecting the government’s argument
for a sentencing enhancement because of the vulnerability of
some victims of the crime charged in Count 3.

The government appealed the district court’s judgment of
acquittal on Count 6 and its refusal to apply the sentencing
enhancement for vulnerable victims on Count 3, and White
appealed the district court’s refusal to grant his Rule 29
motion as to Counts 1, 3, and 5 and to sustain his objection
to Count 3 based on constructive amendment of the indictment.
For the reasons that follow, we affirm the district court’s
rulings on the Rule 29 motions as to all four counts, and we
affirm White’s convictions on Counts 1, 3, and 5, but we
vacate White’s sentence and remand for resentencing because
the district court applied an incorrect standard in deciding
whether to consider an enhancement for victims’ vulnerability…

Read the entire Opinion here
BillWhiteopinion2012

Note: Count Six is for Richard Warman.

Bill White responds to WSLS article: “There will be no change in sentence”

March 2, 2012

Bill White wrote:

As I posted on Facebook yesterday … this story is false in almost all of its essentials.

The Fourth Circuit issued a divided opinion. The Jew and the Negro judges issued separate opinions condemning me; the white judge said my convictions should be vacated. All the judges said my appeal raised issues that should be taken up by the Fourth Circuit en banc — and they will.

Plus, I have already served the three months by which the maximum sentence would be raised by a one level enhancement. There will no change in sentence. In the real world, my probation is more likely to be terminated early for good conduct before the summer.

The Roanoke Times has fabricated this narrative of my “downfall”, but, while useful to them, it also constrains their reporting so that they are unable to tell the truth. They just publish lies and ignore developments that contradict them. Of course, their readership has also dropped from 110,000 to under 70,000 in the eight years I’ve been in Roanoke — so the people who live here are on to them.

Feel free to post this information on your website.

Also, you may want to refer people to the Facebook page for my new book, Centuries of Revolution, or to the ordering link:

http://www.facebook.com/#!/CenturiesOfRevolution

http://www.barnesreview.org/the-centuries-of-revolution-democracy-communism-zionism-p-553.html?zenid=41720e7b966df07dc6980723ff9a7da7&cPath=80_49




The news story:

Bill White’s sentence thrown out by federal appeals court
By: Scott Leamon | WSLS
Published: March 01, 2012 Updated: March 01, 2012 – 6:07 PM
» 0 Comments | Post a Comment
ROANOKE, VA —
Think of it as a “do over.”

In a 50 page opinion issued today, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals tossed out Roanoke Neo Nazi Bill White’s 30 month prison sentence he received in 2010.

Since the court credited White with the time he had already served, he has since been released from prison.

In December 2009, a jury convicted White on four counts involving threatening several people.

The judge threw out one of the convictions.

The three judge panel upheld White’s convictions. There was a dissenting opinion from one of the justice’s in part of the case.

The opinion shows that the majority of the justices found that the judge who sentenced White didn’t factor in the age of some of the victims at a Virginia Beach apartment complex in which White was convicted of threatening tenants.

The ruling means White could be sentenced to more time beyond 30 months, meaning there’s a possibility he could go back to prison.

No new sentencing date has been set.


Somebody should figure up how many millions the government has spent on the political persecution of Bill White. I’ve been told by a former ANSWP member that it was over one million “before Bill went to court”!

What is this about? Off the top of my head – The government argued that Bill White should get extra time for targeting children because he sent letters with racial comments to some children of the Negro Tenants of Virginia Beach. But someone, the judge or the defense, argued in court that White had not “targeted” the kids because they were children, but because they were involved in a [BS] “He called us racial names” court case. Therefore, “targeting children (because they were children)” was not applicable to Bill White’s case. – americafarm

ACLU Virginia’s web page on US v. White

June 2, 2011

Updated November 22, 2011.

U.S. v. White (amicus)
Legal Standard for “True Threats.” (4th Circuit Court of Appeals, amicus) Counsel: Gabriel Walters and Rebecca Glenberg for the affiliate.

…Oral argument was heard on October 28, 2011.



Updated October 20, 2011. According to the ACLU’s active cases page, oral argument is scheduled for October 28, 2011.


ORIGINAL POST

Supposedly, sometime this summer there should be a decision on Bill White’s appeals in the Fourth Circuit regarding the three guilty verdicts from the Roanoke trial in December, 2009.

From the ACLU Virginia’s website, the “active cases” page –

Source: http://acluva.org/5884/u-s-v-white-amicus/

U.S. v. White (amicus)

Legal Standard for “True Threats.” (4th Circuit Court of Appeals, amicus) Counsel: Gabriel Walters and Rebecca Glenberg for the affiliate.

William White, a white supremacist, was convicted by a jury in federal court of making threats against various people. The judge set aside some, but not all, of the convictions on First Amendment grounds. White argued, among other things, that he could not be convicted of making threats unless there was proof that he had intended his statements to be threatening. The judge disagreed, holding that the government need only show that the statements would be understood as threatening by a reasonable listener. White appealed. On October 4, 2010, we filed an amicus brief arguing that the First Amendment prohibits punishment of threats unless the defendant intended his statements to be threatening.

Court Documents
Click link to view the pdf file:
Brief Amicus Curiae- Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

url: http://acluva.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/White-Amicus-Fourth-Circuit.pdf

Tags: Free Speech

ANSWP, LLC versus ANSWP mailing list

November 11, 2010

Question: Why wasn’t everybody on the ANSWP mailing list dragged into court along with Bill White when he and ANSWP were sued by the Unnamed Citizens (Virginia Beach Tenants)?

Answer: The ANSWP, LLC that was named in the lawsuit was a limited liability company set up by Bill White. He was the owner. The ANSWP mailing list was something different. Bill White can’t remember, but he thinks the mailing list was a Yahoo Group called “answp-world”. (If so, that Yahoo Group no longer exists). The people that are (or were… or will be, for that matter) on the ANSWP mailing list are not at risk to owe money to the Unnamed Citizens.

Article on first day in kindergarten, I mean Court

August 26, 2010

Laurence Hammack, again, doing a slightly better job of earning his paycheck. Why does he list the women’s names when they wished to be called A, B, C, D, and E? (A, B, C, D and E got $30,000 each or so for annoying their white landlord until he screamed “This place is like a ghetto plantation!” It happens.)

Neo-Nazi figure White now target of civil suit
William A. White is being sued by a group of black tenants who claim they were harassed.
By Laurence Hammack
981-3239

Neo-Nazi leader William A. White, already serving prison time for making racially motivated threats, now faces the possibility of financial punishment.

In a civil trial that began Wednesday, a group of black tenants from a Virginia Beach apartment complex is claiming that White harassed them in May 2007 after learning of a discrimination lawsuit they had filed against their white landlord.

Identifying himself as the commander of the Roanoke-based American National Socialist Workers Party, White sent the five women letters adorned with swastikas and addressed to “Whiney Section 8 N—–.”

Following a rant about blacks on welfare, White concluded: “You may get one over on your landlord this time, and you may not. But know that the white community has noticed you, and we know that you are and never will be anything more than a dirty parasite — and that our patience with you and the government that coddles you runs thin.”

The women remain so frightened of White that on the night before the trial began, two of them were harboring reservations about going forward with the case, their attorney, Tony Troy, told the jury.

When the trial resumes today in U.S. District Court in Roanoke, the women are expected to describe their reactions to the letters from White, who for years used the Internet and other means to harangue those who don’t share his racist views.

As White sat scribbling notes at the defendant’s table, the jury listened to a recording of an Internet radio show in which he giddily recounted the scare he caused among residents of the 15½ Street Apartments in Virginia Beach.

“I bring this up not to brag about how I managed to flip out some Negroes,” he told his listeners. Rather, he said, the point was how to employ the old Southern maxim of “showing the spooks some haints.”

White explained that during the civil rights movement, blacks were terrorized by members of the Ku Klux Klan and their billowing robes. “The dumb n—– would believe that they were ghosts of Confederate soldiers” — or haints, White said.

“It’s the old trick of spooking the spooks,” White said of the tactics he used.

Two of the women suing White have already testified against him in an earlier criminal trial. The 33-year-old was convicted in December of threatening them and two other people in unrelated cases and was later sentenced to two and a half years in prison. White was transported from the federal prison in Beckley. W.Va., to attend the trial.

The plaintiffs — Annette Reddick, Tasha Reddick, Arlene Carter, Tiese Mitchell and Crystal Lewis — have not asked for a specific amount. Their lawsuit seeks both compensatory damages for them and their children and punitive damages against White.

In the past, White has claimed that his bigoted statements should be protected by the First Amendment. But Judge James Turk ruled earlier that the neo-Nazi cannot raise a free-speech defense in the civil trial.

That left White’s attorney, John Weber, to argue during his opening statements that the plaintiffs have not met the legal burden of showing they are entitled to damages. Among other things, Weber said the women chose to remain at the apartment complex in spite of their fears, and that some of their eight children were too young to comprehend the situation and therefore should not be compensated.

Weber also pointed out that the women have already received settlements of between $20,000 and $30,000 from the lawsuit that first attracted White’s attention. In that case, landlord John Crockett Henry was accused of making racial slurs and imposing a 10 p.m. curfew that applied only to his black tenants.

The trial, scheduled to last three days, will resume today at 9 a.m.

Bill White on TV news, August 25th, 2010

August 26, 2010

Udpated August 27th – Looking around for some news on this (stupid) trial, and found this page of old news videos: http://www2.wsls.com/topics/types/person/tags/bill-white/

The shots from the latest “news” report all appear to be from last year or before.

Update: Not sure of the date of the video on wsls.com, but he WAS wearing the same shirt in 2008. Maybe that’s the prison uniform?

Bill White in prison photo

October, 2008

Typical lame TV coverage of the civil suit:

http://www2.wsls.com/news/2010/aug/25/4/neo-nazi-bill-white-back-court-civil-trial-ar-472791/#comments

Video and photos from the station’s archives.

I don’t think Bill White CAN claim “it’s only free speech” this time, because FREE SPEECH HAS BEEN ABOLISHED UNDER THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION!!!!! We know that now.

“You can think anything you want, but keep it to yourself” – Judge Turk, of the Obama Nation

Please – If anyone is in communication with Bill, now, tell him that I sent a “next day” letter to him at the Roanoke City Jail, but it was returned to me (wrong envelope, I suppose). -americafarm
_____________________________________________________________________________

The article:

The trial will resume at 9 a.m. Thursday morning.

Attorneys for the plaintiffs (the five Virginia Beach women suing White) said to expect to hear from all five women and one of their husbands Thursday morning and into Thursday afternoon.

The plaintiffs also intend to play a videotape disposition of White from quite some time ago, where White talks about the case.

White’s attorneys told jurors they intend to defend him by arguing the plaintiffs blew the case totally out of proportion and that White was simply practicing free speech.

In May 2007, White sent every tenant at a Virginia Beach section eight housing complex a racially offensive letter and a copy of his Neo-Nazi magazine.

All five women received the mailer. At least one immediately went into hiding. Another woman’s small child opened the packet and looked at the magazine.

The five women caught White’s ire after they sued their landlord, a man White did not know and has never met, for violating the Fair Housing Act in 2006.

A U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) investigation found the landlord violated the tenants’ rights by setting a 10 p.m. curfew which he only enforced on blacks. The report also found the landlord intimidated the tenants after they filed a HUD complaint.

Using a different attorney firm than the one handling their current White lawsuit, they settled out of court with the landlord for between $20,000 to $30,000 apiece, according to courtroom testimony.

White also published the personal information of the lawyer whom represented the women in the landlord case, Kevin Mottley, on at least one white supremacist website, the Vanguard News Network.

A judge later ordered the information taken down but for White the damage was done.

Mottley continued to investigate White and later turned his findings over to the FBI in the spring of 2008. Mottley’s investigation was the primary catalyst which set off a sweeping investigation into White resulting in three criminal convictions last December.

One of those convictions was for threatening the five Virginia Beach tenants. At least two of them testified against White in his criminal trial.

Original post:

Roanoke Neo Nazi Bill White’s civil trial has begun in federal court.

Five Virginia Beach women are suing White over a racially charged letter White sent them back in the spring of 2007.

For the latest details, watch WSLS 10 On Your Side tonight at 6 p.m.

Hearings for the African-American Tenants civil suit against White

August 23, 2010

“Tamika, LaToya, LaShondra” and the rest clog up the US Court system with another frivolous lawsuit. Seven member jury trial scheduled for August 24th, US District Court, (not sure if that is the Poff Federal Building), Roanoke.

10:00:00 AM – RKE – – J. Turk – PREL. HG./UNNAMED CITIZENS v. WHITE/7:09CV00057

They are suing Bill White and the “American Nazi Party” for violation of Fair Housing laws, emotional distress and racial animosity/thought crimes. Bill White can’t claim freedom of speech this time, because of his prior conviction on these same letters and comments to the unnamed citizens.

The hearings will continue for the rest of the week, starting at 9:30 a.m.